A dispute within a family concerning a £10 million amusement park empire has surfaced as one son accused his father, a prominent figure in the carnival industry, of causing harm and making threats regarding a carousel utilized in the renowned Winter Wonderland event at Hyde Park.
At the High Court in London, allegations were brought forward by Joseph Manning Junior and Clayton Manning against their father, Joseph Manning senior, claiming they were in fear of him. The family feud revolves around the control of the family business, which includes the popular Old MacDonald’s Farm and Fun Park located in Brentwood, Essex.
The sons, aged 43 and 33 respectively, are taking legal action against their father, asserting that he reneged on promises of passing down the highly profitable family enterprise to them.
Joseph Snr’s group of companies, estimated to be valued at around £10 million, also manages temporary funfair events in major cities and provides entertainment services for Winter Wonderland in Hyde Park and Bluewater’s Winterland.
The family conflict was brought before a judge when the companies, now under the brothers’ management, sought an injunction to prevent Joseph Snr from harassing company employees or disrupting daily operations.
Richard Power, representing the companies, argued that such an order was necessary due to past incidents involving alleged violent behavior and interference by Joseph Snr, who was removed as director in September 2024.
Power claimed that the father physically assaulted both sons in July 2024, resulting in injuries, and made threats to sabotage Winter Wonderland attractions. There were also accusations of unauthorized entry and disruptive actions at various events.
In response, Joseph Snr refuted all claims of violence and harassment, suggesting that his sons were the instigators of the confrontations. The legal battle also involves inheritance issues, with the Manning brothers accusing their parents of planning to exclude them from the estate.
The siblings allege that they were promised ownership of the family business but are now facing disinheritance plans. They claim to have financially contributed to the business and seek legal recognition of their entitlement to shares and assets.
The court proceedings revealed conflicting narratives, with Joseph Snr’s legal team arguing that he had been generous towards his sons and had made share transfers. However, the brothers claimed that their father’s actions were aimed at diminishing their stake in the business.
The judge is deliberating on whether to extend a temporary injunction against Joseph Snr, restraining him from engaging in intimidating behavior or interfering with events without proper authorization.
Cookie Notice: This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and provide personalized advertising. By using the site, you agree to the use of cookies as described in the Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.
