Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, has voiced support for the recent guidance on single-sex spaces, stating that it is the appropriate direction to take, despite potential disagreements. She emphasized that debates and legal challenges were expected regardless of the content of the new guidance.
During her appearance before the Women and Equalities committee, Phillipson highlighted the importance of balancing the rights of women and trans individuals, expressing concern over the increasingly contentious nature of the broader discussion on the topic.
The revised guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) last month clarified that single-sex facilities such as toilets, changing rooms, hospital wards, and refuges should be accessed based on biological sex rather than gender identity. This clarification aligns with a Supreme Court ruling from 2025.
Phillipson reassured that the new code provides clarity for service providers like gyms, leisure centers, and cafes. She acknowledged that while not everyone may be completely satisfied with the guidance, she believes it strikes the right balance. The minister anticipated ongoing debate, scrutiny, and legal challenges in this contentious area.
Concerns were raised about the financial implications of legal battles on organizations like Girlguiding, the Women’s Institute, and Parkrun, with Phillipson acknowledging the challenges smaller organizations might face. She emphasized that the draft code adequately addresses the needs of different protected characteristics.
Phillipson expressed hope that progress can be made based on the published code, aiming for inclusivity while ensuring that both trans individuals and women can access the services they require. She emphasized the possibility of providing single-sex services without targeting individuals unfairly.
A campaign group, Trans+ Solidarity Alliance, disclosed that over 100 MPs had signed an early day motion (EDM) to reject the code, citing it as unjust and unworkable. The group hopes to prompt a reevaluation of trans equality based on the strength of opposition in Parliament.
EDMs serve to highlight opposition to a particular issue but do not automatically trigger a debate or vote on the matter.
